Embedded licence alternatives: resell automation without an OEM agreement
The short answer: an embedded-platform licence (often sold as OEM or white-label) lets you distribute automations that run on a vendor's platform without each customer buying a subscription - in exchange for a negotiated agreement covering distribution rights, branding constraints, term and support. The alternative this directory is built around is an ownership model: compile each automation into a standalone desktop artifact you own, deliver the executable to your customer directly, and keep the relationship - and the margin - between the two of you.
What an embedded platform licence typically covers
- Distribution rights - what you may ship, to how many clients, and whether the grant is per-client, per-seat or revenue-based.
- Branding constraints - whether the vendor's name, marks or runtime notices must remain visible to your customer.
- Term and renewal - embedded agreements are usually annual; a lapsed agreement can leave distributed automations stranded.
- Support boundaries - which side owns first-line support, escalation, and uptime commitments for the platform your automation depends on.
- Pricing structure - negotiated, and rarely published. Treat any figure you read elsewhere as a report about one deal, not a price list.
Embedded licence vs the ownership model
| Dimension | Embedded licence | Compiled artifact (ownership model) |
|---|---|---|
| What the customer receives | An automation running on the vendor's platform | A desktop executable named for the bot |
| Customer requirements | Platform access, account, connectivity | Their own machine; nothing to install |
| Hosting burden on you | Platform must stay reachable (vendor-hosted or self-hosted) | None - you host nothing per client |
| Branding | Per the agreement's constraints | Your brand on the launcher and the listing |
| Billing model | Negotiated agreement, typically annual | Product licence per the pricing page; your price to your customer |
| Remote switch-off | Depends on the platform's controls | Yes - server-controlled activation stops a launcher at its next start |
| Offline capability | Bounded by platform availability | Configuration fetched at launch; the run is local |
| Update path | Platform-side changes, on the vendor's schedule | Configuration-channel updates propagate to delivered launchers without re-delivery |
Remote switch-off and the update channel are documented with their exact propagation bounds on the security page.
The ownership model, step by step
- Build the workflow in the desktop product and compile it into a standalone launcher.
- Brand it: your customer sees your name on the artifact and the listing.
- Choose the access model - public, password-gated, or server-controlled activation when the contract needs a kill switch.
- Deliver the file with its published SHA-256 digest and the platform install steps; the customer verifies and runs it.
- Invoice your client directly. There is no per-sale step through anyone else.
The full sell-side walkthrough - onboarding, licensing tiers, a worked revenue example - lives on the sell your bot page.
When an embedded licence is still the right choice
This page is not a brief against embedded licensing, and there are real situations where it wins: your customers are already standardised on the platform and want everything inside it; you need the vendor's managed hosting, SLAs and integrations more than you need ownership; or the automation depends on platform capabilities you cannot reproduce in a desktop artifact. If none of those apply - if what you actually want is to deliver automation a client runs on their own machine under your brand - the ownership model removes the agreement, the renewal and the per-client cost entirely.
Frequently asked questions
What is an embedded platform licence?
Do I need an OEM licence to sell bots I build?
How much does an embedded automation licence cost?
Can I white-label automation for my clients?
Can I switch a sold bot off remotely?
Do my customers need their own automation platform licence?
Next comparison: can you export a workflow as a standalone app?